Unexpected Results lesson illustration

 

 

What does it mean when we say that light has a dual nature?

 

 

 

Unexpected Unexpected Results lesson illustrationResults!:

 

 

As long as you are
above a certain frequency ...

1. When you brighten the light source

 

Unexpected Results lesson illustration 

Get more electron emission

 

 

Unexpected Results lesson illustration

Unexpected Results lesson illustration

Unexpected Results lesson illustration

Unexpected Results lesson illustration

 




Rate of
Photoelectron
emission
Unexpected Results lesson illustration
  Intensity of light
(Brightness)

 

 

 

 

... but

 

not faster

 

(more energetic) electrons!!!!

K.E. of
Photoelectrons
Unexpected Results lesson illustration
  Intensity of light
(Brightness)

 

 

 

 

 

Results Contradict

Unexpected Results lesson illustration

Wave Theory!

 

 

 

According to
 Wave Theory…

 

 

 Increasing Brightness,
Increases Energy of wave

 

Unexpected Results lesson illustration

Unexpected Results lesson illustration

 

 

Should Increase Kinetic Energy
 of Electrons Emitted

 

Unexpected Results lesson illustration

- It Didn't!!

 

 

 

 

Check Your Understanding

5 quick questions — pick an answer to see if you’re right.

1. Light above the threshold frequency hits a metal. If the light is made brighter, what happens?

2. Making the light brighter does NOT change which of these?

3. According to wave theory, brightening the light should have…

4. The intensity of light shining on a metal is doubled (above threshold). The emitted electrons' maximum kinetic energy…

5. Why were the photoelectric results called "unexpected"?

NYSSLS Regents Practice · Modern Physics · Historical Investigation

The Gold Foil Experiment

In 1909, Rutherford’s team fired positively charged alpha particles at a very thin sheet of gold foil. Almost all passed straight through. A very small fraction were deflected at large angles, and a few bounced almost straight back.

Which conclusion about the atom is best supported?

▶ Want a challenge? Open 6 more Regents-style questions  (harder · mixed formats)

Challenge score: 0 / 6

Support or Refute · Justify

C1. A student makes the following claim.

Claim: The alpha particles that bounced almost straight back must have collided with electrons in the gold atoms.

Place a check mark in either the Support or Refute box. Justify your response.

Multiple choice

C2. Which model did this experiment disprove?

Substitute values

C3. An alpha particle (charge 3.20 × 10−19 C) is 1.0 × 10−13 m from a gold nucleus (charge 1.26 × 10−17 C). Substitute numerical values into a mathematical representation that can be used to determine the magnitude of the electrostatic force between them. Then calculate the force. (k = 8.99 × 109 N·m2/C2)

Fe = (8.99 × 109 N·m2/C2)(qα = × 10−19 C)(qAu = × 10−17 C)( × 10−13 m)2 = N
Draw the vector · Determine the magnitude

C4. An alpha particle moves to the right, heading straight toward a gold nucleus that is directly to its right. When the alpha particle is 5.0 × 10−14 m from the nucleus, choose the direction of the electrostatic force on the alpha particle, and determine its magnitude. (Use the charges and k from the previous question.)

alpha particle
●
Fe = N
Multiple choice

C5. Why was a very thin foil used?

Constructed response

C6. Rutherford concluded that (1) most of the atom is empty space and (2) the atom’s positive charge and most of its mass are concentrated in a tiny nucleus. Identify the evidence from the experiment that supports each conclusion.